top of page
Screenshot 2025-12-30 at 4.57.09 PM.png

Implementation

4 Versions, Unique Improvements

Screenshot 2025-12-30 at 6.09.52 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-12-30 at 6.10.10 PM.png

SpiralPanels realized its model through 3D design, hardware engineering, and software programming. Collaborating with labs in Kyungpook and Keimyung University, SpiralPanels was able to create its fully functional prototype in 4 versions.

Version 1

Version 2

In the second model, we converted the first model’s structure into a design that can actually be 3D-printed.

We also added four support pillars to each layer to improve the model’s stability.

In the initial model, we built a 3D model of SpiralPanels, including its main axis and the arrangement of the reflective panels.

This early model established how the structure operates and outlined its overall form.

Screenshot 2025-12-30 at 6.10.15 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-12-30 at 6.10.47 PM.png

Version 3

Version 4

In the third model, after building the second version, we 3D-printed it and tested each component in real conditions such as windy, unsteady, or rainy environments. 

Based on the testing results, we identified errors and areas for improvement and refined the design—such as reducing the thickness of the reflective panels and fine-tuning hole sizes. However, implementing electronical parts showed the weight of the components hinder movements.

In the fourth model, we reduced the overall weight, addressing a key issue from the third model.

In particular, to minimize the electricity required to rotate the reflective panels, we streamlined the support architecture—retaining only the structurally essential frame and adjusting thickness—to reduce rotational inertia and overall power demand.

Real-World Experiment

In the final model, the prototype, after 3D-printing the fourth model, we installed an aluminum reflective film and a 10 cm² solar panel.

We then connected an Arduino servo motor and control board to apply the calculated rotation rates, creating a functional prototype capable of rotation and electricity generation.

We conducted an experiment to compare the SpiralPanels model with traditional single-layer PV panels. We covered the top of the prototype to test if the model properly compensates for the shadow, and compared the electricity output on a sunny day.

Screenshot 2025-12-30 at 6.14.22 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-12-30 at 6.15.50 PM.png

Total System Output:
4-6X 

Using single-layer results under shading conditions, the projected 8-layer SpiralPanels system produces 16.9–27.2 Wh (median 21.8 Wh). A conventional single-layer panel is estimated at 3.42–5.33 Wh , meaning SpiralPanels delivers roughly 4–6× higher total output due to its vertical stacking and integrated reflective panels.

Screenshot 2025-12-30 at 6.17.19 PM.png

Footprint-Normalized Total System Output:
2.5-4.0X

 

Based on the 8-layer total output, SpiralPanels is estimated to generate 3.96–6.39 W per m² of footprint (median ≈ 5.13 W/m²). For the same footprint, a conventional single-layer solar system produces 1.26–1.97 W/m² (median ≈ 1.60 W/m²). Even after normalizing by usable installation area, SpiralPanels is predicted to deliver about 2.5–4.0× higher power output per footprint than a standard single-layer system.

Screenshot 2025-12-30 at 6.17.26 PM.png

Net Energy Output:
4.8-5.0X

 

The net energy output can be compared by subtracting the actuation system’s electricity use from total generation. Assuming ~360°/day cumulative panel rotation, actuation consumption is estimated at 0.03–0.75 Wh. Even after this deduction, the 8-layer SpiralPanels produces 21.0–21.8 Wh versus ~4.33 Wh for a conventional single-layer panel—about 4.8–5.0× higher net energy output.

Ready to power your future with sustainable energy?

Fill out the form below and reach out to SpiralPanels

bottom of page